9/31: Martha Marcy May Marlene

Posted: December 9, 2011 by Couch Baron in 31 Days, 31 Films
Tags: , , , , , ,

“Waiter, I asked for no exposition.” “Oh, yes, you had the Martha Marcy May Marlene!” – A thing I thought

This is my kind of movie. At the very beginning, a college-aged girl (Elizabeth Olsen) flees a small farm and runs into the nearby woods, pursued by a boy of similar age (Brady Corbet) with urgency, if not malice. He catches up with her at a diner in a nearby small town, and although he eventually allows her to stay there by herself, the interaction between them is thick with mistrust. This feeling, combined with the complete panic she exudes when she calls her sister Lucy (Sarah Paulson) to come pick her up, gets you immediately terrified on her behalf, and even though Lucy, who hasn’t seen her in two years and has no idea where she’s been, does retrieve her without incident, the dread that Something Bad is going to happen doesn’t go away.

Nor should it. From here, the story slips back and forth between the past and the present, sometimes so seamlessly that it can take you a moment to figure out when you are. In the present, Martha (that’s Olsen, in a wonderfully honest performance; she’s also Marcy May and Marlene, but I’ll leave it to the film to explain why), after arriving at Lucy’s Connecticut lake house and meeting her fiancĂ© Ted (played pompously by the fiiiiine Hugh Dancy), Martha begins to show signs that she’s experienced some trauma; she inappropriately skinny-dips in a communal lake and climbs into bed with the couple while they’re having sex. Even though it did occur to me that some of this might have been done out of revenge for Lucy’s attempt to feed Martha a kale-and-ginger smoothie, it’s clear that something’s terribly wrong, and although the couple are admittedly rather slow to react to these incidents with anything other than self-involved irritation, we know to cast a frightened eye into the past.

What it tells us is, pretty much, as bad as we feared. At first, Martha’s arrival on the farm (how she or any of the other girls were recruited to this life is never explained, but it doesn’t take much imagination to guess something plausible) is pleasant enough; the place is run like a commune, with everyone pitching in to support the farm’s operations and supplemental cottage industries, spending their down time singing songs and admiring their leader, Patrick (John Hawkes), with a rather cultish intensity that clearly signals what’s to come. And soon it does: All the young girls, we learn in a terribly unsettling sequence, are expected to give themselves physically to Patrick, and the act itself is almost matched in magnitude of horror by the willing way the other women grease the wheels for this practice and how reverently they refer to it. Hawkes’s Patrick is almost a mirror image of his Teardrop in Winter’s Bone, a smiling devil instead of a vicious protector, and the spell he casts over the cult is so convincing you can’t possibly blame Martha for helping it along, much less falling under it.

Back in the present, though, things continue to unravel: Martha becomes increasingly more erratic, both alone, where she gets jumpier and jumpier as she waits for the cult to discover her, and with other people, as she experiences fits scary in their intensity. And it might occur to you around this point, given that in the past Martha has adjusted to Patrick’s sexual demands and even seems happy, that something she finds even more traumatic is coming via flashback. And when that something is revealed, you truly fear for Martha’s safety; it makes you guess that the cult’s general policy regarding departure is akin to that of a Roach Motel. In the present, Lucy and Ted, long overdue for their We Need To Talk About Martha session, finally decide to get her some help as their lakefront vacation draws to a close, and if the movie weren’t paced so tensely, you’d probably roll your eyes and mutter “About time.” (I should note, though, that Paulson and Olsen have great sisterly chemistry that’s chock full of believable interactions, which provide a welcome respite from the intensity of the rest of the film. Also, Hawkes is, once again, amazing.) But Martha remains unable or unwilling to talk about what’s happened to her, and as such is always stuck with the sense that she needs to be looking over her shoulder, and the film’s unorthodox ending only leaves you with the same feeling — part of me will always wonder if she’ll ever be safe.

Comments
  1. Sarah says:

    My God, this movie. Like you said, the ambiguity of so many moments makes them all the more unsettling and scary – the instructions written on the wall over the phone? The women all gathered just outside the door, waiting for their “turn” to eat? For me, seeing that creepy group sex scene..and realizing this type of life had been going on for Martha for TWO YEARS..that was just a gut punch.
    I have heard from others that it was a frustrating film – too much left unsaid and unexplained (from the characters and the director/writer), but I dug it. Cannot wait to see what Sean Durkin does next.

  2. alannaofdoom says:

    Oh yes yes yes yes yes this movie was incredible. The way Sean Durkin increased the tension so slowly but so inexorably with every scene… It kept me in a state of near panic for two hours, and when in ended I was keyed up and exhausted and shaky and thought, “I have never needed a drink more than I do right now.” Hmmm, re-reading that, it sounds like a bad thing, but I adore movies that completely consume you.

  3. Seankgallagher says:

    I’m afraid I was one of those people who rolled their eyes and muttered, “About time” when Lucy and Ted FINALLY figure out Martha needs help, which damaged the movie for me. It’s too bad, because all the scenes at the cult feel scary and real, and Olsen and Hawkes deserve every bit of praise they’ve been getting, and the director deserves praise for setting those scenes up without explaining too much, but the rest of the movie left me profoundly irritated.

    • Sarah says:

      Sean – I really do know what you mean. For the longest time, I was feeling like “It is going to be SUCH a relief when Martha finally tells them all about what happened”..and then when I realized that wasn’t going to happen, it was even more depressing. Coming out of a lengthy experience with a cult causes symptoms not unlike PTSD after combat, but in those cases, everyone knows and sympathizes with what you have been through. Actually, I thought it was fairly true to life that Lucy and Tom would believe (and more importantly, want to believe) that if they were just kind and patient and loving, Martha would “open up”. Sadly, in severely traumatized victims of cults, that more often not the case. And for an audience to not get that kind of (expected, anticipated) catharsis is it’s own kind of trauma, IMO.

  4. Couch Baron says:

    @Sarah and Alanna: The party freak-out was hard to watch too, even though you could see it coming a mile away. Yeesh.

    @Sean: I definitely wanted to shake all of them, but I thought the film did a good job in showing Lucy’s mix of guilt and self-involvement to the point where she was really uncertain as to how to approach Martha. As for Ted…well, he’s British.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>